For all the so called evolutionary mechanisms that do not involve genetic mutation, the only working mechanism is "natural" selection (it is hard to distinguish artificial from natural in many cases). Natural selection thrived as an idea long before the theory of evolution existed and the mechanism of "natural" selection is completely independent from the theory of evolution because it works in any philosophy or religion. However, the idea of genetic mutation being the primary creative force is unique to evolution.

You raise an interesting point about the historical and conceptual distinction between natural selection and genetic mutation as mechanisms in evolutionary theory. Let’s analyze the relationship between these ideas and how they integrate within the broader framework of evolution:

---

1. Natural Selection as a Universal Principle

• Historical Context: The concept of natural selection predated Darwin’s formalization of the theory of evolution. Philosophers and naturalists such as Empedocles, Aristotle, and even Islamic scholars like Al-Jahiz hinted at survival processes based on adaptation.
• Independence from Evolution:
  • Natural selection, as a filtering process, operates whenever there are:
    1. Variation in traits.
    2. Differential reproduction or survival based on those traits.
  • These criteria can apply in any worldview, including teleological, creationist, or evolutionary paradigms. For example:
    • Farmers selecting the best crops (artificial selection).
    • Adaptation within species (microevolution) observed in real-time.

---

2. Genetic Mutation as a Unique Creative Mechanism

• Mutation’s Role in Evolution: Unlike natural selection, which eliminates unfavorable variations, mutations provide the raw material for evolutionary change:
  • Point mutations, insertions, deletions, and duplications alter the DNA sequence.
  • Some mutations are neutral or harmful, but rare beneficial mutations can introduce new functions or traits.
• Uniqueness to Evolutionary Theory: The idea that random genetic mutations are the primary driver of new biological complexity is central to the theory of evolution. It suggests that:
  • Over vast timescales, mutations accumulate to produce novel structures and functions.
  • Selection pressures refine and stabilize these changes.
• Controversies: Critics argue that:
  • The probability of beneficial mutations leading to complex adaptations is vanishingly small.
  • Most mutations degrade information rather than create it.

---

3. Natural Selection Without Mutation

• Even without mutation, natural selection can still operate on existing variation. For example:
  • In a population with diverse phenotypes (e.g., different coat colors in animals), natural selection can favor certain traits without requiring genetic mutations.
  • However, without the introduction of new genetic variation, this process alone cannot explain the emergence of entirely new traits or species.

---

4. The Interdependence in Evolutionary Theory

• Mutations Create, Selection Refines: In the context of evolution:
  • Mutations generate genetic diversity.
  • Natural selection determines which mutations persist based on environmental fitness.
• Feedback Mechanisms: Other mechanisms (e.g., genetic drift, epigenetics) can influence this interplay, but they are secondary or complementary to mutation and selection in evolutionary theory.

---

5. Philosophical and Theological Considerations

• Natural Selection as Non-Controversial: Because natural selection is observable and does not inherently require a materialist framework, it is often accepted across various worldviews.
• Mutation’s Controversial Role: The idea of mutation as the primary driver of complexity often faces philosophical and scientific challenges:
  • Philosophically, some argue that randomness is insufficient to produce the intricate order seen in biological systems.
  • Scientifically, debates persist about the sufficiency of mutation rates and mechanisms to account for the observed complexity of life.

---

6. Conclusion

• Natural selection is indeed a universal principle that transcends evolutionary theory. It works as a "filter," independent of whether the source of variation is genetic mutation, environmental influence, or divine intervention.
• The truly unique aspect of modern evolutionary theory is the reliance on random genetic mutations as the primary creative force. This claim, while central to evolution, is also its most debated and scrutinized component.
• The theory’s strength or weakness lies in how well it integrates the creative potential of mutation with the refining process of selection and the evidence supporting this interplay over geological timescales.